Talk:You Are Not Alone (1978 film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the You Are Not Alone (1978 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:YouAreNotAlone.jpg
editImage:YouAreNotAlone.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
In the rationale page for non-free content I found what I believe may be an appropriate rationale for the picture posted with this article: "Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary" L. Greg (talk) 00:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Links
editPlease leave the link there, i was thinking people can see the ending of the movie.--Iceglass (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Meaning ? please explane more what you need... Retrorick wikipedia talk 15:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the Plot Synopsis
editThe plot synopsis seems almost like a review of the film. I think it needs a re-write. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.155.188 (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on You Are Not Alone (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091014055411/http://www.theskykid.com:80/2009/10/04/you-are-not-alone-an-interview-with-lasse-nielsen to http://www.theskykid.com/2009/10/04/you-are-not-alone-an-interview-with-lasse-nielsen
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Controversy
editThe article states that the 6 men and 16 women came forward to complain of sexual abuse by the director of this film all of whom were underage. I think the wording of that section is misleading. first of all, there were no underage females appearing in this film. The paragraph does state that the 22 actors in question appeared in this and "other films." Since this article is about this movie, only facts directly related to this movie should be in this article. Instead the paragraph should simply state the number of the underage boys who appear in this movie claim to have been sexually abused by the director and if part of the public record, their names. They would all be in their 50's or 60's by now. It could then go on to say that actors in his other films also came forward. Additional details about other victims should be on the Wikipedia page for those films or on the director's Wikipedia biography page. A web page about a movie should not have biographical information about the director nor especially anyone not directly related to that movie.
I would like to request that someone better skilled than I make this correction or I may at a later date assuming nobody objects here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.190.183.221 (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)