Talk:Young Artist Award
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Young Artist Award article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Proposed deletion
editBased on the deletion discussion (linked above), I will wait to see if this year's awards produce substantial coverage, then (likely) renominate for deletion. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Improving this article
editEditors are encouraged to visit sources found through (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) and help expand and further source this article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Statue-guy2.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Statue-guy2.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
- What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image for this article before it is deleted.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Award or Awards?
editWhy is the article speaking of "Young Artist Award" when the offical site is speaking of "Young Artist Awards"? http://www.youngartistawards.org/ Is there a wikipedia-rule, that we have to use allways the singular form? If so, can someone give me a link to that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.134.237.193 (talk) 04:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know of a rule or a guideline regarding this. However, it does seem to be the consensus: Academy Award, Grammy Award, Tony Award, Golden Globe Award, Pulitzer Prize, Nobel Prize, etc. are all titled in the singular. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- The official website is basically an archive of winners/nominees. This article page details the purpose/history of the award itself, voting, winners, the statuette, etc. (at least what info could be found). As stated above - With pretty much any award: Academy Award, Emmy Award, Grammy Award, etc, the singular is used when referring to the award itself, while "Academy Awards", "Emmy Awards", "Grammy Awards", etc are used when referring to the CEREMONIES, or when referring to MULTIPLE awards. The Academy Award website is Oscars.org Because it's basically a database of over 80 ceremonies and over 2000 awards, same with the Emmys.com website, etc. Check any Wikipedia page for any major award (that isn't just a "stub" or a "list") and you'll find Wikipedia's purpose differs from simply advertising the next ceremony. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Golden Globe Award which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)