| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Poll
editDespite having made this edit that gives justification in the WP:RS of why she is claimed to be the "leading" candidate, I should point out that the RS says Simpson's campaign sponsored the poll. Cincinnati_mayoral_election,_2017 use the same poll, so I will mention that on the talk page there. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
more RS
editThis looks like WP:RS. Seems a bit trivial so I am not including it:
--David Tornheim (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
More WP:RS about a poll from Cranley. I'm a bit too tired to try to work in right now: [2] --David Tornheim (talk) 01:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
more info.
edit@History Wizard: I'm curious what source you used for the information you just added. I asked at some noticeboard about what was reliable for adding to this article, regarding self-published sites. Did you find any independent sites? Also, the primary was yesterday (Tuesday), so there should be more WP:RS today. --David Tornheim (talk) 07:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Here are the links to the websites where I found the info: [3] [4] [5] [6] History Wizard (talk) 09:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)