Talk:Zuzana Čaputová
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Primary sourced content
editEarly career
| ||
---|---|---|
After she concluded her education, she worked in the local government of Pezinok, first as an assistant in the legal department, and later as a deputy to the town mayor. She later moved into the nonprofit sector, where she handled public administration and the issue of abused and exploited children. Subsequently, she worked as a project manager at the civic association EQ Klub on the local community development project. Between 1998 and 1999, she completed the training cycle "General Management - Management of Change" and in 1999 the ARK - Mediation course, accredited by the Ministry of Education of Slovakia. Between 2001 and 2017, she worked with VIA IURIS, a civic organization, since 2010 as a jurist. The organization focuses on the rule of law and the promotion of justice in specific areas of justice, such as the functioning of the judiciary, the responsibility of public officials, the transparent handling of public property, and the strengthening of public control over governmental authorities. In Pezinok, for more than ten years, she was at the forefront of a public campaign against the authorization of another landfill that would aggravate pollution of the soil, air and water in the city and its surrounding areas. The fight against the landfill culminated in 2013, when the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic ruled that the new landfill was illegal and violated environmental norms. The Court derived its verdict from the decision of the European Court of Justice, which upheld the public right to participate in decision-making on issues that affect the environment. The ECJ has clarified several other legal issues at hand in the case, which are now binding throughout the whole European Union. She has her own law office and is the author and co-author of several publications and a member of the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (ELAW) network of environmental lawyers and jurists. |
Electoral manifesto
|
---|
Čaputová repeatedly claims that "justice in Slovakia does not always apply equally to everyone". If she wins the presidency, she plans to exert as much pressure as possible toward immediate and systemic changes in the police force, the prosecution office, and the judiciary. She is also convinced that the police force must work as a completely independent institution, separated from politicization, ideological abuse, or corrupt officials, headed by an impartial professional with proven meritorious service. She further claims that it is necessary to transform the prosecutor's office into a publicly-managed institution.[1]
Čaputová views the long-term care services for seniors in Slovakia as problematic and oftentimes neglected. As the President, she would work on making sure that patients will spend less time in institutional care, opting to instead move them into either domestic care or smaller and more specialized facilities. She also wants to exert constant pressure on the ruling government and the regional administrations to increase spending for public healthcare services and salaries of workers. Within the community of Progressive Slovakia, she also assists in breaking the taboo on the subject of dignified end of life. Čaputová is also of the view that euthanasia requires a serious and meaningful discussion rather than serving as a mere point of dogmatic squabbles.[2]
Čaputová sees the wealth in Slovakia mainly in nature, in forests full of life, in clean rivers and underground reservoirs, which are a vital supply of drinking water, in fertile fields that provide people with secure jobs and livelihoods. She insists that environmental protection can no longer remain a marginal issue in Slovak politics. She also criticizes the fact that the governments of the past have made it possible for massive and oftentimes illegal deforestation across innumerable natural reserves and ecosystems, favoured by special interests and business oligarchs. As the president, she wants to push for at least 5% of the most environmentally valuable territory to remain as a strictly protected zone.[3]
Čaputová said that she supports legalizing registered partnerships for same-sex couples. In her own words, she would also try to brush the edges and reduce the fear of "otherness" that exists on this topic. In a discussion organized by the SME Journal, she lectured on the possibility of adopting children by homosexual couples: "I prefer the child to have a biological mother and a biological father. If he were to grow up in institutional care, I think he'd be better off with two loving beings, even if they were of the same sex."[4]
Regarding the question of abortion, Čaputová supports maintaining the existing status quo: "If there is an extreme situation and the dilemma is between deciding whether to adopt a legal norm that will intrude upon the personal lives of citizens or leave it to women's responsibility and their personal choice, I choose the responsibility of a woman."[5] References
|
I have copied this unsourcedprimary sourced section here.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 03:34, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- I took care of the Early career segment where other sources exist. Sorry can't help with the manifesto. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
This paragraph strikes me as true, but probably uncitable original research. May we please delete it?
"Furthermore, as the country had previously also had a female Prime Minister, Iveta Radičová, from 2010 until 2012, Čaputová's election as President of Slovakia also included it into a small group of parliamentary republics which have had both a female head of state and head of government."
I'll check back Monday. Thanks. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I plan to reword this to only say that the country previously had a female PM, which can be sourced. Sorry there is no source for the rest of it. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2020
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think the page is protected. 31.148.160.206 (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is true. The log says:
09:47, 5 April 2019 Ymblanter (talk · contribs) protected Zuzana Čaputová [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) (Persistent vandalism: request at WP:RFPP)
- This was during the intense period of her announcing her bid for the Slovak presidency (29 March 2018), through to her presidential inauguration (15 June 2019). I suggest relaxing the protection. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- I invite Ymblanter (talk · contribs) to consider removing the semiprotection per my point above. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- I configured pending changes instead, let us see what happens.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)