Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/1806 Great Coastal hurricane

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

1806 Great Coastal hurricane

edit
(
)
  • Reviewed: Neomysis integer
  • Comment: Hook wording might be awkward (attempting to imply it's an estimate), up to reviewer's discretion.

Moved to mainspace by Cloudchased (talk). Self nominated at 19:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC).

ALT1 ... that an estimated 36 in (91 cm) of rain fell on Edgartown, Massachusetts as a result of the 1806 Great Coastal hurricane?
  • I don't have access to the sources but this is long enough (over 6000 bytes), new enough (4 March), within policy (it's already a GA, so this is a second check for that), and there is a QPQ. The hook is fine as is, but I think my alt is worded better. I will leave that to the person that puts this in a queue to decide on. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 02:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Just a note: There's a bit of a back and forth going on between BlueMoonset and I over whether or not there should be a comma after Massachusetts in the alt. BlueMoonset contends that the MOS demands one, and I contend that placing one there is grammatically incorrect. Since we're now both at 2 reverts, it's going to have to be resolved by someone else. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 20:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Then let me supply yet another rearrangement of the hook that not only obviates the need for a comma, but places more emphasis on the article and removes the convert template, which is always controversial in DYK hooks (I've changed the original ALT to ALT1, so we're consistent in the numbering):
I thought "during" was more economical than "as a result of". —BlueMoonset (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Sure, that also works. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 04:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/1806_Great_Coastal_hurricane&oldid=1016630921"