- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 09:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 20:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Nominated within 7 days of being 5x expanded. Article is well-sourced with inline citations. Coverage is neutral and free of copyright violations according to Earwig (41.9% is only for a short amount of quotation which is fine). Hook is interesting while being neutral as well as both mentioned and sourced in the prose. QPQ has been done. Good to go. Aria1561 (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man, there's nothing in the article about Brian Little's side losing their match, just that they played two days later (and to be honest, I'm not sure it would be relevant to add that info to this article). Is there something else you can suggest hookwise? MeegsC (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Okay. I did so. MeegsC (talk) 09:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Nominated within 7 days of being 5x expanded. Article is well-sourced with inline citations. Coverage is neutral and free of copyright violations according to Earwig (41.9% is only for a short amount of quotation which is fine). Hook is interesting while being neutral as well as both mentioned and sourced in the prose. QPQ has been done. Good to go. Aria1561 (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)