Template:Did you know nominations/1995 India cyclone

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 06:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

1995 India cyclone

edit
  • ... that a storm in November 1995 killed 63 people across the country of Nepal, 33 of them related to avalanches?
  • ALT1 ... that a 1995 storm killed 63 people in Nepal, 33 of them related to avalanches?

Improved to Good Article status by Hurricanehink (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 15:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC).

  • GA is long enough, and posted by due date. Hook is interesting, cited and verified. No copy vio detected. Text is neutral. QPQ done. GTG.Nvvchar. 02:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • More concise ALT1 added. Edwardx (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Red XN Sorry, but I have to object here. Neither hook is acceptable: how can 33 people possibly be related to avalanches? If you want to say that the causes of their deaths were related to avalanches, then that is what you would need to write (in one way or another). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT2 ... that a 1995 storm killed 63 people in Nepal, 33 of the deaths related to avalanches?
  • ALT3 ... that a 1995 storm caused 63 deaths in Nepal, 33 of them related to avalanches? Oceanh (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed to check ALT2 and ALT3 hooks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT2 and ALT3 verified to source. Rest of review per Nvvchar. sst(conjugate) 04:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)