- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
2022 Ohio Issue 1
- ... that after the Ohio Supreme Court imposed restrictions on bail procedures, the dissenting justices participated in a bus tour to campaign for a ballot measure that took away their power on that topic? Source: [1]
Created by Antony-22 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC).
More of a comment rather than a review, but I'm not actually sure if the hook can run anytime soon. WP:DYK says that hooks about election candidates can't run within 30 days of their election (except for multi-article hooks that mention all candidates). While the page doesn't mention anything about non-candidate ballot measures, I wonder if would violate the spirit of it. To be sure I'll ask for clarification on WT:DYK regarding this as well. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Antony-22: Per this discussion it doesn't seem like the hook can run until after November 8 at the earliest. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Full review needed. Nomination will not be able to run on the main page prior to 12:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC). BlueMoonset (talk) 02:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
In general the article looks good, the main issue is that it needs to be updated with the election results. Some minor points: I don't think the "Supporters of the measure..." paragraphs need to be in the lead. Now that the measure has passed, I think the "Reactions" heading is probably better as "Supporters and opponents" or maybe "Opinions"? I would expect "Reactions" to cover the measure's passage. Legoktm (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Legoktm: Thanks for the review. I've added the current results and updated the tense of the article. In looking at other similar articles, it seems like "Campaign" is the typical section title. I believe that a brief overview of arguments for and against the measure is an important part of the lead. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 07:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Awesome, looks good (I fixed 2 minor tense issues as well)! Legoktm (talk) 04:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
In general the article looks good, the main issue is that it needs to be updated with the election results. Some minor points: I don't think the "Supporters of the measure..." paragraphs need to be in the lead. Now that the measure has passed, I think the "Reactions" heading is probably better as "Supporters and opponents" or maybe "Opinions"? I would expect "Reactions" to cover the measure's passage. Legoktm (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
