Template:Did you know nominations/A.C.O.D.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

A.C.O.D.

edit

Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 04:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Actually when I look at the picture, I think butt crack more than tailbone. I think it would be more descriptive and generate more hits if we used a hook such as the following
  • Article is at 1497 B, which is short of 1500. Even if it was over 1500, it feels like a stub. On top of that, the article says it was a temporary tattoo, not a real one, which makes the hook far less interesting. Sorry. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
    • Actually, temporary butt crack tattoos are quite the stylish thing now. See this Allure magazine article. If you have a young daughter, ask her what she plans to wear to the beach this summer. Surely, she will be showing off her tatts. This is a chance for DYK to be a trendsetter.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
    • Also, it is now 1581 characters.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
      • Okay. I think it would be more compelling if you work that Allure article into the page, and possibly the hook. Oh, and if I had a daughter, I would not let her put on a temporary tramp stamp. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)