Template:Did you know nominations/Aami Ashbo Phirey

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Hook interest

Aami Ashbo Phirey

edit

Created by Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Lahariyaniyathi (talk) at 04:35, 22 March 2018 (UTC).

  • Article has 1676 characters, and was created on 21 March. I've made a couple of tweaks. No QPQ required. Not sure if the hook is interesting enough to people unfamiliar with Anjan Dutt's work, but it is sourced appropriately. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Agreed, the hook is not hooky for an international audience. Do you have another suggestion? Yoninah (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • In addition to concerns about the hook, the article itself might need some work: the article at the very least needs some copyediting due to grammatical errors. In addition, much of the "Release and reception" section, apart from needing a copyedit as well, lacks references, and in any case needs to be expanded or at least be converted to prose form as opposed to a list. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
I've moved this back to the pending nominations page per my comments above. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Oh! Right after the film's release that section was added, and you are right that the section needs some work. About hook, I do not have any other hook suggestion, unless I force something, which I do not want to do. I'll work on the mentioned section. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I copyedited the article and added a "citation needed" tag under Release and reception. Yoninah (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I could not find the ToI review that gave the movie 1.3/5. I got this one where information is different. I have removed the portion from the article. --Titodutta (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately, neither nominator nor creator has responded—the nominator hasn't edited for quite a while, and the creator hasn't responded to a talk-page ping. Marking for closure as unsuccessful, though if a new hook is proposed before this closes, the review can resume. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
I've left @Titodutta: one final talk page message as it appears he edited two days ago; I suppose we can wait for a response for a few more days. If he still doesn't respond after a few more days, then this nomination can be closed. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry for delay in replying. I do not have a more interesting hook for this article. --Titodutta (talk) 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Noted. @BlueMoonset: endorsing marking this for closure. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:26, 2 June 2018‎ (UTC)