- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Acer diabolicum
- ... that Acer diabolicum, the devil maple, gets its scientific and common names from its curly stigmas (pictured)? Source: "The scientific and common names arise from the curious hornlike stigmas which persist at the inner junction of the fruit nutlets, resembling the horns of the devil." Japanese Maples: The Complete Guide to Selection and Cultivation, Fourth Edition By Peter Gregory, J. D. Vertrees
- ALT1:... that ...?
Created by Abductive (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC).
Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns. The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
@Dodger67: did you pass this? If so, please add the appropriate tick. --evrik (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done. evrik apologies for the delay in tagging it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Repeating Roger (Dodger67)'s tick here, which was added after the "review again" icon; the bot that moves approved hooks only sees the lowest-appearing icon on the page, so duplicating the tick lower down will get this nomination to the Approved page. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done. evrik apologies for the delay in tagging it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but several paragraphs lack inline citations, per Rule D2. The footnotes are also uncited. Yoninah (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have been slowly adding citations. Let me know when I am done. Abductive (reasoning) 01:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, it looks like all paragraphs have at least one inline citation. Is it ready? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Abductive: I added a cn tag after a chunk of text under Cultivation and uses. The footnotes also need sources. Yoninah (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know how to put sources inside footnotes. Can you provide an example article that does it correctly? Or would a link to Wiktionary suffice for the word definitions? Abductive (reasoning) 22:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Abductive: you just insert <ref>Book or newspaper source information</ref> at the end of the footnote and before the closing squiggly lines. Yoninah (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think I've completed the sourcing. I had to delete a footnote because I couldn't find the source I read back in December. I suspect that Google's algorithm was influenced by the creation of the Wikipedia article, since a number of my old search results are not reproducible. Abductive (reasoning) 05:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)