Template:Did you know nominations/Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Harrias talk 21:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada
edit- ... that commercial speech receives less protection than political speech as dictated by Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District Court?
- ALT1:... that free speech protections that apply to political speech does not apply to commercial speech as dictated by Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District Court?
Created/expanded by Keynachow (talk). Nominated by Radolfo (talk) at 14:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- This was listed incorrectly at March 3 and without creating the template - that's all fixed I think (hope). However, it was only nominated on 6 March, 7 days after it reached article space. I'm inclined to let this one through as the nominator is clearly not up with current procedures, but others may disagree. I haven't done any other checks yet. Mikenorton (talk) 21:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't mind the date, but there's serious referencing issues with the nomination. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Referencing issues unaddressed in ten days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)