Template:Did you know nominations/Antonio del Pollaiuolo

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Antonio del Pollaiuolo

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Tomb of Pope Sixtus IV, 1493

• ... that the only papal tombs to survive the demolition of Old St Peter's and be reconstructed in the present St Peter's Basilica are the two by Antonio del Pollaiuolo? Source: Ettlinger, L. D. “Pollaiuolo’s Tomb of Pope Sixtus IV”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol. 16, no. 3/4, 1953, pp. 239–74, JSTOR - on the first page
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/England in the High Middle Ages
  • Comment: I think it's x5 expanded, but I don't have the checker

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 13:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Antonio del Pollaiuolo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - something needs citing
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Johnbod: Good article. Though, "His main contribution to Florentine painting lay in his analysis of the human body in movement or under conditions of strain, but he is also important for his pioneering interest in landscape. His students might have included Sandro Botticelli." needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, done that - I dropped Botticelli as it's rather tenuous. Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: Good enough now? BorgQueen (talk) 01:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Seemingly abandoned by the previous reviewer @Onegreatjoke: so I'm reviewing it. BorgQueen (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)