- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Arikamedu
edit
- ... that at the Arikamedu archaeological site (entrance pictured), the Indologist Jouveau Dubreuil found gems and an intaglio of Augustus Caesar and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).
- Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --Bruzaholm (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Review needs to be completed: QPQ will need checking, and close paraphrasing and neutrality should be checked as well, since original review did not cover these aspects. Hook sourcing was not mentioned, so it should probably also be checked. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
This is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is properly licensed, the hook facts are reliably sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
