Template:Did you know nominations/Ascension Island Marine Protected Area
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ascension Island Marine Protected Area
- ... that Ascension Island has declared its entire ocean territory a protected area with no commercial fishing permitted? Source: Pew Trusts
- ALT1: ... that research undertaken to create the Ascension Island Marine Protected Area found it would be more economical to ban commercial fishing altogether than to sell fishing licences? Source: Muench et al. 2022: "It was concluded that the current number of licenses sold would not cover the monitoring and enforcement cost for option 1: partial closure of the EEZ"
- ALT2: ... that the South Atlantic Anomaly prevents some remote sensing methods from working over the Ascension Island Marine Protected Area? Source: Rowlands et a. 2019: "VIIRS night time vessel detection products are locally ineffective because of the South Atlantic magnetic anomaly"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Texas Centennial half dollar
- Comment: Other hook ideas welcome!
Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
CMD (talk) 14:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |