Template:Did you know nominations/Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress)

5x expanded by Miraclepine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

ミラP@Miraclepine 16:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC).

  • Article has been tagged "Primary sources" since August - since we're now at the end of September, I don't think it's likely to be fixed.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Changed to the "?no" template, as I see that talk page discussion is ongoing. Hopefully this gets resolved soon.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • @Crisco 1492: Yes, I told the editor who added the tag that I should have the issue resolved and asked them if I can remove it per WP:BRD. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Alrighty. I've got this nomination watchlisted, so I'll come back in a couple days and see how things are going (personally, I've always believed that interviews published in reliable sources are still fact checked, and even self-published primary sources are accepted for non-controversial things, but...) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Upon checking, LeónGonsalvesofGoa (whom I'm informing of this DYK) hasn't edited in the past five days. Should I give them a few (maybe three) days before I let someone else decide on the tag or would it be more practical to skip straight to the latter? I'm leaning the latter because I want this done quickly, but I feel the former is more courteous since I asked them anyway (earlier today I might add). ミラP@Miraclepine 03:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is new enough, 5x expansion on August 22nd. Appeared in ITN, but as an RD, which per WP:DYKNEW does not disqualify the article. Earwig's does not check for plagiarism in foreign-language sources, but based on Google Translate, I don't see any paraphrasing / copyright issues. I prefer the panda hooks (and note that the source indicates that she was identified by the host, which is hilarious).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)