Template:Did you know nominations/Balluta Buildings
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Balluta Buildings, Villa St Ignatius
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
Ornamentation on the façade of Balluta Buildings
- ... that Balluta Buildings (detail pictured), one of the finest Art Nouveau buildings in Malta, was built on the grounds of Villa St Ignatius, one of the earliest Gothic Revival buildings on the island? Sources:
- "The majestic and monumental Balluta Buildings represent the epitome of the short-lived Art Nouveau architectural period in Malta." (Hughes, Quentin; Thake, Conrad (2005). Malta, War & Peace: An Architectural Chronicle 1800–2000. Midsea Books Ltd. p. 139. ISBN 9789993270553.)
- "By the 1970s all of the surrounding grounds [of Villa St Ignatius] ... had been sold off and developed into condominia starting with the imposing Balluta Buildings completed in the 1920s." (Said, Edward (November 2017). "St Ignatius Villa, Scicluna Street, St Julians – Heritage Assessment" (PDF). Architecture XV. p. 10.)
- "In conclusion this begs the question: is Villa St Ignatius one of the earliest if not the first building in Malta with Neo-Gothic motifs?" (Said, Edward (November 2017). "St Ignatius Villa, Scicluna Street, St Julians – Heritage Assessment" (PDF). Architecture XV. p. 12.)
- Uploaded more photo of the Balluta buildings on commons.
- Reviewed: Castroville Historic District
Created by Xwejnusgozo (talk). Self-nominated at 13:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC).
@Xwejnusgozo: per WP:DYKSG#H4, a QPQ review per article is required. So you’ll need one more review. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the sources against the hook. I was going to question the third (Said) source, as the quote is phrased as a question, but on reading the source itself it’s clear that the hook is accurate and sourced. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Otherwise, hook is well written and just under the 200 limit, the articles are both long enough, both well written and well sourced. The articles are both new enough. So good to go once the QPQ is done. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Onceinawhile, have you checked the remaining "within policy" criteria: neutrality and close paraphrasing/copyvio? If so, please mention them in your review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you BlueMoonset. Both articles are within policy, written neutrally, well sourced, and free of close paraphrasing/copyvio/plagiarism. Onceinawhile (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Onceinawhile, have you checked the remaining "within policy" criteria: neutrality and close paraphrasing/copyvio? If so, please mention them in your review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Otherwise, hook is well written and just under the 200 limit, the articles are both long enough, both well written and well sourced. The articles are both new enough. So good to go once the QPQ is done. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the sources against the hook. I was going to question the third (Said) source, as the quote is phrased as a question, but on reading the source itself it’s clear that the hook is accurate and sourced. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Onceinawhile: I just reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Jefferson Street. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 00:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Good to go. Onceinawhile (talk) 07:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)