Template:Did you know nominations/Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad
The following is an archived discussion of Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad
edit- ... that one of the contributing factors to the decline of the Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad was the advent of trucks in the mid-20th century? (Non-lead hook.)
- Comment: Seems interesting enough.
Moved to mainspace by King jakob c 2 (talk). Self nominated at 17:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC).
I'm not sure I agree with that comment, whether it's a comment about the hook or about the article. As far as the hook is concerned, I would have thought that many, if not most, railway companies worldwide were adversely affected by the advent of trucks in the mid-20th century. Meanwhile, the impression I get, from reading the article, is that the Railroad was a fairly unremarkable now-"fallen flag" short line. However, that doesn't mean it's unworthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or in DYK. Can I suggest a couple of alternative hook topics? The lead says that the Railroad was one of five railroads serving Bloomsburg, which seems to be a pretty small town. Alternatively, the fact that the final nail in the coffin of the Railroad was Hurricane Agnes in 1972 may be a potential hook. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- That could work. I agree it's a much better idea than my original one.King Jakob C2 14:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- New hooks should actually be proposed here, so we can get a reviewer to check them out. While suggested topics are nice, they can't be reviewed: we need actual hook text for ALT1, ALT2, or however many alternate hooks you create. Please do so soon; this has been sitting for over two weeks. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry. OK. ALT 1: ... that the Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad was one of five railroads serving Bloomsburg near the turn of the 20th century? King Jakob C2 22:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure how much was checked in previous review, so I'll start from scratch:
- Article - moved to main space on day of nomination 23 February, so new enough; 6925 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig and duplication detector; and assessed as C class.
- Hook ALT 1: - within length criteria at 121 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #3 in lead (AGF offline source); and reasonably interesting.
- QPQ - looks as if nominator only has one previous DYK, so not necessary (although I'm sure one would be appreciated); no image.
- Ref #3 needs to be correctly formatted and page numbers used, particularly as it is the ref for the ALT 1 hook; ref #13 for google maps needs to be corrected; are some of the refs self published? I also don't think the 'Paper on the Bloomsburg and Sullivan Railroad' needs to be an external link as it is used as a ref. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:31, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Ref is now in DYK acceptable format - personally I prefer exact page citation format, but that's just me! 
SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
