Template:Did you know nominations/Blow (Beyoncé Knowles song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 20:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Blow (Beyoncé song)

(

)

Reviewed: Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania)

... that despite its single release being scrapped, "Blow" debuted on the Billboard Hot Dance Club Songs at number 48?

Created by EditorE (talk). Self nominated at 00:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC).

The hook and the article meets criteria. Made a small correction (it's - its). Good to go. GinaJay (talk) 13:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination lacks required quid pro quo review. A quick check finds the nominator has over five previous DYKs and needs to preform a review before this nomination can be promoted. --Allen3 ^talk 21:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Done 和DITOR E tails 22:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

"Scrapped" is a bit too colloquial, IMO. The artist should probably be named to give some context. I propose ALT1:

... that despite its single release being cancelled, "Blow" by Beyoncé debuted on the Billboard Hot Dance Club Songs at number 48? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adabow (talk • contribs) 22:27, 6 March 2014‎

That's fine too. 和DITOR E tails 22:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

GinaJay, please be far more specific in your review. In particular, mention each DYK criterion you believe has been met (or not). Did you check size? Newness? Neutrality? Hook sourcing? Article sourcing? Close paraphrasing? It's very important to be comprehensive not only in your reviewing, but in explaining what it is you reviewed. Simply saying "meets criteria" is not sufficient. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Note that the article has been moved to Blow (Beyoncé song). Adabow (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Full review needed, including new ALT hook; original review was problematic and missed at least one obvious issue, so a completely new examination is needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

: The hook is well sourced and interesting in my opinion; the article meets the required readable prose size and sourced with reliable links (however with a foreign-language link [Gaon] which nonetheless is easy to understand); no close paraphrasing was found neither original research; for the date nominated the article was/is eligible and was expanded fivefold; the subject explained in the article is handled with neutrality. I do not know if EditorE has done a QPQ review however one is needed so I can pass the nomination. Prism △ 11:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have done one after this article was nominated. It was Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania). 和DITOREtails 12:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  - : Good to go then. Nice work! Prism △ 12:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)