- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 07:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Boston Strong
edit... that the term "Boston Strong" became popular in Boston after the Boston Marathon bombings, which occurred one year ago today?
- Reviewed: Huntington Junior College
- Comment: If possible, it would be great if this could be run on April 15th.
Created by Ktr101 (talk). Self nominated at 17:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC).
Interesting topic, and a great candidate for a special occasion DYK on April 15. Article is new enough and long enough, but generally weak, and I think it's lame to focus the hook on the fact of the anniversary. (Furthermore, the hook was not even actually supported by the article as I found it, since the article didn't give the date of the bombings.) I've made several edits to the article. The article can be improved further (e.g., expand the "History" discussion and add an analysis of the linguistic origins), and I suggest an alternative hook (and there are other possibilities):
- ALT1: ... that two days after last year's Boston Marathon bombings, U.S. authorities received two applications to register the term "Boston Strong" as a trademark? --Orlady (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Shoot, I should have realized that I was a bit biased in my knowledge and would have done that. I'm going to expand the article a bit more now, as it is very lopsided as-is. I like this hook though, as it works a lot better than the one I could think of, so thanks for the suggestion! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. Going with ALT1 which is well-referenced. No policy issues detected and QPQ done. Please note request for running this on April 15th. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
