- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bryan Nash Gill
edit- ... that artist Bryan Nash Gill, known for his sculptures and cross-sections of trees, named his son Forest?
- Reviewed: Arthur Tipton
Created by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 12:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC).
I regret having to pull this back, but I haven't had any luck with rewording this in prep given the complicated tenses involved. Neither source nor article says that Gill came up with the name "Forest"; it could have been suggested by his wife for all we know. All the source and article say is that the son's name is apt. I initially thought of "had a son named Forest", but it sounded as if the son was the one who died (Gill died in 2013), and "has a son named Forest" doesn't work because Gill did die. I hope a good juxtaposition can be found, and apologize for not being the one who could do it. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nearly half a day later: would "who was known for his sculptures and cross-sections of trees, had a son named Forest?" be an acceptable alternate? I think past tense throughout could work... BlueMoonset (talk) 06:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: I mulled it over for a while and the best I could come up with was "had a son named Forest". I like your suggestion. 97198 (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
