Template:Did you know nominations/Bu-Ma Democratic Protests

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 12:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

Bu-Ma Democratic Protests

edit

Created by Rhee In Joon (talk) and Myn727 (talk). Nominated by Rhee In Joon (talk) at 05:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Educational projects, mainspaced too early (I told the students not to do it, but, sigh...), I hope a few days will be acceptable for a review here, per WP:IAR, in the interest of motivating students to keep contributing after the course is over. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
  • There are some issues with the article, but shouldn't be too difficult to resolve. Detailed review below: Jolly Ω Janner 04:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Article
  1. New YesY It was nominated a week late, but I'm willing to put this aside as it seemed a genuine mistake was made.
  2. Length YesY article is 4,794 at the time of my review.
  3. Policy N the following sentence may not be neutral, but it is hard to tell since it is not cited and the language is poor "The Republic of Korea's National Assmelby election operated December 1978, seriously influenced to illegal plutocracy election and election of authority". Furthermore, that whole paragraph lacks citations. Earwig's Copyvio Detector comes up with no issues.
  • Hook
  1. Format N It's under 200 characthers, but has some language issues. I would suggest "... that the 1979 Bu-Ma Democratic Protests in South Korea influenced the latter Gwangju Uprising and June Democracy Movement?"
  2. Content YesY The hook is interesting enough and neutral. Its claim is cited inline to a non-English source, which I will accept as good faith.
  • Other
  1. QPQ YesY looks like you are new enough here to not need to review any nominations. Hopefully my review will help you in the future!
  • @Piotrus: I have since notified the students and appropriately labelled the article. Jolly Ω Janner 18:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Both users have been inactive since 24 December, despite multiple notifications over the article. I think this should be rejected, unless anyone volunteers to resolve the issues. Jolly Ω Janner 06:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)