- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Created by Fuebaey (talk). Self nominated at 19:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
QPQ: 
- n/a
Overall: 
Having checked off the DYK requirements as satisfied, I am left with one minor quibble. Original hook is cited in lead, but not referred to elsewhere; however, any info in the lead is supposed to be also contained in the main body of the text. I recommend emendment.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. The original hook is actually cited in the first sentence of the main body. ALT1 is stated in the lead, but I won't object if someone feels the need to duplicate it under Business. Fuebaey (talk) 19:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ooohh, I confused the two hooks above (I hate it when I do that.) At any rate, whether a lead sentence is or isn't a hook, info in the lead should be a summation of some fact(s) offered in the main text. And I can't add the necessary change because I am the reviewer. Conflict of interest, you know.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- n/a
Having checked off the DYK requirements as satisfied, I am left with one minor quibble. Original hook is cited in lead, but not referred to elsewhere; however, any info in the lead is supposed to be also contained in the main body of the text. I recommend emendment.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)