Template:Did you know nominations/Chasmology

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
AfD closed with the article being redirected to Yawn, so there is no article remaining for DYK to review

Chasmology

edit

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 01:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article is new and was created on 00:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2159 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (2.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 03:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Hate to say it, but this article is really about yawning, not the study of yawning. EEng 11:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
@EEng: I completely disagree. This article follows the format of other "study of" articles. Discussing the main theories involved in the study is routine formatting. Heck, a section directly describing the subject of the field is also common. In this case, that would involve the physiology of yawning. I haven't added that yet, but I can. Look at Endocrinology for an example. And, obviously, the history section of this topic isn't going to have much, since it is a new field. The history is based largely around the research done by the three main people in the field, Olivier Walusinski, Wolter Seuntjens, and Robert Provine. SilverserenC 20:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Endocrinology is a vast and ramified field in which work hundreds of thousands of researchers and specialist practitioners. "Chasmology" is a neologism, coined by this guy Walusinski, not in the OED and producing ten (count 'em -- ten!) hits on Gscholar [1] (one if which is a typo). There's absolutely nothing in the article that wouldn't be completely at home in yawning. Unless you can come up with more sources I'm considering taking it to AfD. EEng 02:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
EEng, if you aren't going to take this to AfD, then the review needs to continue. Please decide as soon as possible; it's already been over three weeks. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination on hold until AfD has concluded. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Article was redirected as a result of AfD, so nothing left to review for DYK. Closing as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)