- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chen Fangyun
edit- ... that Chen Fangyun proposed a control system that was crucial for the launch of China's first geosynchronous communications satellite in 1984? Source: "In April 1984, this system proposed by Chen Fangyun had played a vital role in the launch of China’s first synchronous communications satellite."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/K/DA
Created by Zanhe (talk). Self-nominated at 08:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC).
- :* General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
appears straight forward Whispyhistory (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: Thanks for your review. Just to let you know that I've switched the QPQ so I can use the four-hook review for a three-hook nomination that I'm making. This shouldn't have any effect on the review. -Zanhe (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- okay Whispyhistory (talk) 06:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this. What's the difference between the source saying "synchronous satellite" and you saying "geosynchronous satellite"? Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: There's no difference. "Geosynchronous" is the more scientifically accurate term, but often shortened to "synchronous" for public consumption. See Synchronous Meteorological Satellite, for example. -Zanhe (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- okay Whispyhistory (talk) 06:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: Thanks for your review. Just to let you know that I've switched the QPQ so I can use the four-hook review for a three-hook nomination that I'm making. This shouldn't have any effect on the review. -Zanhe (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
