Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Brooks (gymnast)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Too old
Chris Brooks (gymnast)
edit- ... that gymnast Chris Brooks won the bronze medal in the All-Around behind teammate Jonathan Horton at the 2010 American Cup?
- Reviewed: C. A. Patrides
- Comment: Request Swahili exemption for the time period. Made stub in early December. Another author expanded it just now. He is a newbie...let's get him a DYK.
Created/expanded by Brunettekoala (talk), Nominated by TCO (talk) at 23:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Expansion is only about 3x (from [1] to [2]). There is no precedent for waiving the basic DYK criteria just because an editor is new. rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I would like it considered as a new article, not an expansion. Has been less than a month. My understanding is that the time limits could be "Swahili'd" (and we did have some text about that for new submitters). In the past, I have seen us be pretty generous on the time limit. And it is under a month.TCO (Reviews needed) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It's been a bit long for the Swahili exemption. Perhaps an alternative approach - I see that the original stub had no inline references, only 2 sources listed as "references." Perhaps it could be squeezed in as an expansion of an unreferenced BLP . . . which only requires twofold? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- That could be kind (like the old DYK, I remember). FYI, I have removed my name from the nom, to make it clear that I am trying to help the newb, not me. TCO (Reviews needed) 18:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nothing is changed. The pre-expansion version of the article already had references. The article simply does not qualify for DYK. rʨanaɢ (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)