Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Christmas white-eye
- ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
- ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
- Reviewed: Germania Life Insurance Company Building
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
-
Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.
Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.
