- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Christopher W. Shaw
5x expanded by Thriley (talk), Silver seren (talk), and 7&6=thirteen (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 15:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Christopher W. Shaw; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Note: Article is at AfD; looks like it will be kept. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reviewer needed; AfD closed as "snow keep", so DYK nom can proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'll take it. By the way, good job saving this article from AfD. AdoTang (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
The "favorable reviews" of his research could use some expansion—that's four citations yet only one sentence—but that's just my own opinion and isn't a DYK requirement, seeing it already passes the minimum article length. Unless anyone has any other concerns or I missed something, this should be good to go.
AdoTang (
talk) 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)