- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chromis nitida, Anilocra pomacentri, Cymothoidae
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
... that the yellowback puller (pictured) sometimes has an ectoparasite (Anilocra pomacentri) from the isopod family Cymothoidae?
- Reviewed: The plane crash (Neighbours)
- Comment: 3 articles - 1 expansion, 2 new. Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/EUFOR RCA and Template:Did you know nominations/Borka Pavićević
Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 12:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC).
The first article check out. It is new enough and contains part of the info (that the yellowback puller [pictured] sometimes has an ectoparasite [Anilocra pomacentri]). The second article has been sufficiently expanded and also contains the same info as above. The third article has also been expanded enough, and contains the remaining piece of info. IJReid (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Per DYK rules, the hook fact must be cited to a source at the end of the sentence. The sentence in question in yellowback puller and in Anilocra pomacentri needs a cite. Also, the hook fact should be mentioned in all 3 articles. Perhaps you could add a "for example" line about the yellowback puller and Anilocra pomacentri to Cymothoidae, and cite it. Yoninah (talk) 22:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have added citations to the hook sentences in two of the articles. I'm not sure you are right about the hook fact needing to be mentioned in each article for a multiple hook. I'm sure the point has been discussed on the DYK talk page before now but I forget the outcome. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the cites. I also remember someone questioning the appearance of the hook in all 3 articles, so I'll concede on that, but honestly, I don't see how the hook relates to the Cymothoidae article at all. Neither yellowback puller or Anilocra pomacentri are even mentioned there. All that seems to be mentioned there is that Cymothoidae is an isopod. Moreover, there is no cite in Anilocra pomacentri connecting it to the fact that it is from the Cymothoidae family. Yoninah (talk) 10:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps it is best to forget the Cymothoidae article and just go for
- I have added citations to the hook sentences in two of the articles. I'm not sure you are right about the hook fact needing to be mentioned in each article for a multiple hook. I'm sure the point has been discussed on the DYK talk page before now but I forget the outcome. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the isopod (Anilocra pomacentri) lives as an external parasite of the yellowback puller (pictured)? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Great. Hook ref AGF and cited inline in both articles. Image is pd. ALT1 good to go.- Please don't forget about the Cymothoidae expansion. Could you make a separate nomination with this template as the subtemplate? I'm not sure how to do that. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
