Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Clay Blaker

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Clay Blaker

edit
(
)
  • Comment: article created 8/24 by AngieBocas, had many problems, was nominated for deletion. Article repaired with appropriate references 8/25.

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Ubiquity (talk). Self-nominated at 17:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • ✓ This article is new and was created on 18:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    • ✗ This article is too short at 1305 characters (the DYK minimum is 1500 characters)
      • Article has been expanded and is now beyond 1700 characters. ubiquity (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 26.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
        • Automated copyright "hits" mostly due to song titles, which of course must be copied accurately. ubiquity (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
  • No overall issues detected
    • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 79 characters
    • ✓ Ubiquity has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 3 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Full review needed by human reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • For a start, I have changed "six" in the hook to "seven", because both article and source mention there was a single song followed by six more. Although you have done a substantial amount of work improving this article, I don't think it qualifies for DYK as a two-fold expansion of a BLP (it had some references before you rewrote it and the expansion was less than two-fold). However, it would qualify as a new article if you are prepared to include the original creator in the credits, even though little of their work remains. If you are happy with this, I will finish the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ubiquity: You need to respond to these points before this nomination can advance. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, I didn't see it until today. Of course I'm OK with the original creator being in the credits. Honestly, I didn't realize that there even were credits for this, per se. ubiquity (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are sourced and I assume the nominator is happy with the alteration I made to the hook. The article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Clay_Blaker&oldid=743390189"