- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Coffee production in Panama
edit
Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), and Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 14:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Passes DYK checklist. Good To Go!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- That doesn't say exactly what it says in the article. The text states that the best-quality coffee in Panama is grown in Boquete, not that Boquete has top-quality coffee. Perhaps you could recheck the source, which is offline. Yoninah (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
-
Great. Since I suggested the new hook, could another reviewer sign off on this please? Yoninah (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Six "citation needed" templates were added to the article a few days ago, and that's too many for an article intended to run on the main page. Please add the appropriate inline citations. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:23, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: All inline citations have been provided now and tags removed. No new references have been added.--Nvvchar. 14:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Reviewer needed to check ALT4. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I confirm that Alt4 is referenced to an offline hook Victuallers (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Victuallers, unless you're willing to approve the nomination (including tick), we'll need to find someone to do so... BlueMoonset (talk) 19:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- I get confused by these debates. My reading from above is that (all) we needed was a reviewer to check alt4. So I've looked at alt4 (which is offline). So I believe that
is OK. Victuallers (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
Passes DYK checklist. Good To Go!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you do something about the poorly worded hook? Like:
