- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cudgel War
edit- ... that the Cudgel War was the largest peasant rebellion ever to occur in Finland?
- ALT1: ... that cudgels were the main weapon of the peasants fighting in the Cudgel War?
5x expanded by Catlemur (talk). Self nominated at 19:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC).
- Not a review, but please could the editor who expanded this article break up the text into paragraphs?
The current wall-of-text is very of-putting and hard to read. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not a review, but please could the editor who expanded this article break up the text into paragraphs?
Some of the sources are in Finnish. I looked at the main English language source and found there were large scale copy and paste copyright violations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- In addition to the significant copyvio noted above, the article is not a 5x expansion. The article's size was 3,298 prose characters prior to expansion, which would require a size of 16,490 prose characters, but the article is only 10,263 prose characters now, and will be quite a bit below 9,000 once the copied text has been deleted. I very much doubt it will be possible to achieve a 5x expansion under the circumstances, but since Catlemur hadn't been pinged, I'm going to await a response on whether the article will be further expanded, though I've asked Nikkimaria to check the article and do whatever's necessary to bring it into compliance with Wikipedia's rules on avoiding copyright violations. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
After Nikkimaria removed all the copyright violations and close paraphrasing, the article was shorter than it had been before the expansion began, at 2,810 prose characters. Under the circumstances, I don't see any alternative but to close the nomination as unsuccessful, since there is no longer any expansion to the article.
- Going forward, if a new expansion is attempted without any copyright issues, a new nomination can be made; similarly, if the article becomes a Good Article, a new nomination can be made then. The new base length for expansion will be 2,810, which points to an article of 14,050 prose characters for 5x expansion. That's still quite a bit. Best of luck, Catlemur, whatever you decide. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)