- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 04:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Doug Sahm
Sahm in 1974
Improved to Good Article status by GDuwen (talk). Self-nominated at 16:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. Earwig is picking up some matches, but it looks like mostly names and quotes, plus some non-specific phrases. Hook is cited and interesting, and qpq has been provided. Photo is free use, looks nice and is in the article. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)