Template:Did you know nominations/Dreamtime (climb)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 07:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dreamtime (climb)
- ... that Dreamtime (pictured) is considered one of the world's most famous bouldering routes?
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Aszx5000 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Aszx5000 (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC).
- article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aszx5000 and Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- "Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks all, and here are some additional refs (i.e. Dreamtime and Midnight Lightning (climb)'s fame is easily verifiable in climbing): probably the most famous boulder in the world, https://www.planetmountain.com/en/news/climbing/jernej-kruder-climbs-childhood-dream-dreamtime-cresciano.html, They are two of the most famous problems in the world of bouldering, with Dreamtime—arguably the first internationally famous boulder problem since Midnight Lightning. Just google +"dreamtime" +"boulder" +"famous", and you will get every major climbing magazine (per WP:NCLIMB). Hope that works. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- "Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aszx5000 and Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)