- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Not enough expansion
Dysgraphia
edit- ... that Dysgraphia occurs regardless of the ability to read and is not due to intellectual impairment?
Created/expanded by Hkyoung01 (talk). Self nom at 18:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but this isn't even close to 5x expanded. It was 6,176 characters on November 2 (and 6,110 on October 12). It is currently 10,085 characters long, which is a 1.63x expansion (even if the list was added to the character count [which would be a violation of DYK character counting rules], it would still be 10,705, which is only a 1.73x expansion). For this to meet DYK criteria, it would need to grow to 30,880 characters, which is more than triple its current size. Sorry, but this is one of the problems of trying to expand an already substantial article. However, I would suggest that this might be worth submitting for Good Article consideration. OCNative (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
