Template:Did you know nominations/Eduardo J. Corso
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Eduardo J. Corso
edit- ... that Uruguayan journalist Eduardo J. Corso was known for his "brutal" use of language?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emotions in Virtual Communication
- Comment: hooked fact from El País - included in article
Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 19:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Under 1500 characters, looks very stubby. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Over 1500 chars. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
"Brutal" is not a word commonly employed to describe language use - is this a quote? If so, the word should be in quotation marks. Also, the article says "During his dictatorship" - whose? Gatoclass (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Also, "una sinceridad casi brutal que" - so I have quoted. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, but when you wrote "politcal systems", did you mean political parties? If so, I think you should correct that too. Gatoclass (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- I have read a couple of the article's sources now. Firstly, the source for the hook doesn't say he used "brutal" language, it says he was sometimes "brutally honest", which is a different thing. Also, I think you have failed to sufficiently emphasize his role as a proponent of agricultural interests. Additionally, the article tends to paint him as some sort of extreme hardline right winger and the sources don't seem to support that, he seems to be regarded as a positive contributor in his field of interest and even got a tribute in the Uruguayan senate (a fact which should probably be in the article). So I think you need to review your sources and try to represent him a little more accurately - not that I have read all the sources but judging by the first two he hasn't been represented accurately in the article in my view. Gatoclass (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- I probably wasn't specific enough in that last post. I think if you correct the quote from "brutal" to "brutal honesty", emphasize his contributions to agricultural debate a bit more, mention his tribute in the Senate and clarify that his conservatism was in relation to his Catholic faith, you will probably have done enough to comply with WP:NPOV. Gatoclass (talk) 05:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)