Template:Did you know nominations/Embodied language processing

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Agree with Laura

Embodied language processing

(

)

... that Embodied language processing is the way your body moves can influence how you understand language?

Created/expanded by Lino08 (talk). Self nom at 23:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Article is not fully supported by inline references. See fact tags as to where it isn't. Article is written like an essay, to summarise the problem of where this can be seen, the article says to summarise. Other researchers may disagree with this essay like problem but as we don't know who they are, we get point of view problems because of essay problems. The article also falls under the domain of medical sourcing and there are WP:MEDRS problems. Once these systematic problems are addressed, the rest of the criteria can be addressed but I can't see this happening in any timely manner. (MEDRS is a problem that hasn't been quickly fixed when brought up at WP:DYK.) I'd recommend just failing it given the history of these types of articles at DYK. --LauraHale (talk) 06:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Cognitive science and linguistics aren't medicine.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Linguistics isn't medicine. Cognitive science can fall under MEDRS, and in this case I would agree that it should, and second many of the concerns raised by LauraHale. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)