- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Emily Hale
Emily Hale at Phillips Academy in 1956
- ... that T.S. Eliot defended himself from the grave after 1,131 of his letters to Emily Hale (pictured) were released in January 2020, posthumously stating "I never at any time had sexual relations with Miss Hale"? Source: Washington Post, New York Times, The Guardian
Created by Js229 (talk) and Britishfinance (talk). Nominated by Britishfinance (talk) at 01:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC).
Now that’s interesting! The hook is just shy of 200 characters. No citation issues. The prose is long enough with neutrality. It’s new enough and the image has no issues. All you need is QPQ. ⌚️ (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Trillfendi. I thought this would be interesting (and is getting wide press coverage). I have less than 5 DYKs, so I think it should be okay for QPQ? Britishfinance (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have added the missing (and required) question mark at the end of the hook, which puts it at 199 characters, and "(pictured)" as well, though given the damage to the image, I can't recommend its use. Britishfinance is correct, in that no QPQ is required for nominators who have fewer than five prior DYK credits (and I only see one for them). However, Trillfendi, if a QPQ were outstanding, an approval tick should not be given since there's still something that needs to be done before the nomination can be promoted; instead, the "?" icon is what's appropriate when a QPQ needs to be supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
