Template:Did you know nominations/Emma Sulkowicz

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 13:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Emma Sulkowicz

edit

Created by Jinkinson (talk). Self nominated at 01:37, 1 November 2014 (UTC).

I have decided not to review this nomination formally because of a potential perceived conflict of interest (family ties to Columbia), but I will just say for any reviewer that I see no problems with it. Since the accused's name has been removed from the article, it's fine as far as I see it. Her protest has, as the sources suggest, drawn a great deal of media attention in the U.S., more than enough to make her notable. And the article focuses mainly on that protest, as it should. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. An eye-catching hook and well-written article. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)