- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Frown
edit
5x expanded by MTHarden (talk). Self nom at 16:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hook: Interesting, cited. Before we use this hook fact I think it should be cited to Song's original results; something this controversial should cite the actual research.
- Article: Long enough, new enough. This -- "This universality suggests a shared adaptive quality to frowning allowing for social communication of negative emotional states." -- is uncited, and really should be referenced per WP:OR. This shows no paraphrasing issues, AGF for sources behind paywall. Images are PD.
- Summary:
Please improve the quality of the hook reference and add a reference for the uncited statement. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I expanded coverage of the Hook statement with a few other sourced bits. Song was just interviewed I don't think (aside from his practice at facial reconstruction) he had published anything about number of muscles. But I think the expansion does a fair job of explaining what the number might mean and what it doesn't mean. I also cited that unsourced statement. --MTHarden (talk) 16:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
There we go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
