- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Furina diadema
edit.jpg)
... that Furina diadema is a small, venomous and widely distributed snake in Australia?
Created by Clarevincent2014 (talk). Self nominated at 13:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC).
- Comment First, it'd be nice to mention its alternative name "Red-naped snake" as it's commonly known by the public. And I don't think the hook is interesting enough to attract the readers. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 07:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
: adequate expansion, > 5x since 10/4-10/6. A photo would be nice.
- Consider ALT1: ... that the red-naped snake (pictured) is a small, venomous snake, listed as threatened in Victoria? —Gaff ταλκ 02:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
New reviewer needed, and that review should include the "within policy" checks including close paraphrasing, plus a check of the image. If you're partly involved, Josve05a, then you should not be giving this final approval. Gaff, as you've provided ALT1, which has a new fact, you shouldn't be giving it final approval either. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
This article meets the DYK criteria of newness and length. Going with ALT1 which is well cited. The image has an appropriate licence. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:46, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
