Template:Did you know nominations/George Worrall Counsel

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

George Worrall Counsel

edit

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 09:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC).

  • Can a better hook be proposed here? The one proposed doesn't really seem interesting and in fact feels rather flat. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Added Alt. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Having reviewed the article, it is in date and long enough, and hook facts are cited in the sources. QPQ done, no copyvio, etc. I'd pass it, but still unsure about the hookiness, and I've made another suggestion above - ALT2. Spokoyni (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, I like that. Added some context. I think Wood will get most of the hits but that's fine as I wrote that too. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Of the three hooks I personally prefer ALT1. As Spokoyni has already reviewed this, I'd leave the final choice to them or the promoter. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
All three check out, happy to leave this to the discretion of the promoter. Spokoyni (talk) 09:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)