Template:Did you know nominations/Gott ist mein König, BWV 71
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Gott ist mein König, BWV 71
edit... that Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, is Bach's only church cantata extant in a contemporary print (title page pictured), because the other one is lost?
- Reviewed: Close case
- Comment: the image is rare, - I guess it's not well known that only two of Bach's church cantatas were printed during his lifetime, and one of those is lost (also interesting how small his name is on the title)
Improved to Good Article status by Gerda Arendt (talk) and Thoughtfortheday (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 21:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC).
- Wait, do you mean ALT1:
... of the two Bach church cantatas printed in his lifetime, only Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, is extant?
- No, because I want "my subject" at the beginning, - rather drop the clause about the other one ;) - perhaps like this:
- ALT2:
... that Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, is one of the only two church cantatas by Bach printed during his lifetime (title page pictured)?--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)- The existence of a second church cantata printed during his lifetime seems in doubt. Perhaps ALT3 would be safer? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- ALT3: ... that Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, is the only surviving church cantata by Bach to have been printed during his lifetime (title page pictured)?
- I tweaked it, twice, fine with me, why not, doesn't matter too much how many were lost, - readers will get that not many were printed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)