- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 21:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hōkoku-ji
edit
- Reviewed: Siege of Inabayama Castle
Created/expanded by SusanLesch (talk). Self nom at 22:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hook: Interesting, short enough, referenced.
- Article: New enough, long enough. What makes Must Love Japan a reliable source? Where are the access dates for the Kamakura Today reference? Why do you italicize Zenji, but the sources don't? Paraphrasing check against this source seems okay.
- Summary:
Couple of referencing issues, and a prose question. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Zenji is a foreign (to English) word and so
capitalizeditalicized MOS:Ety on Wikipedia. We can't influence the style guide for the source. - Kamakura Today ref is fixed, thanks.
- MustLove was included because it is in English (and I don't know Japanese) and because it has identifiable creators. I swapped it out.
- Thanks, Crisco 1492, for the review. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Although Zen master may not be the most exact term, for the hook it could draw more readers, so something like ALT1 ... that a bamboo grove (pictured) marks the spot in Hōkoku-ji where the Zen master Butsujo wrote poetry? Also, since Zenji is a title/honorific, I'd suggest putting it before the word. I don't think it needs to be capitalised, as a title; look at our articles for raja, frau, and Kahuna. AGF on reliability of the new sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 is fine with me. (Yes, "Zen master" can come first in a name, but no "Zenji" can't.) -SusanLesch (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Zenji is a foreign (to English) word and so
Alright, ALT1 looks good. Not sure on the italicisation, but not a DYK criteria Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- After the fact, correcting my bad confusion. Reviewer apparently understood I meant "italicized" above. Thank heavens not a DYK requirement to get that right. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)