Template:Did you know nominations/Irreligion in Malaysia
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Irreligion in Malaysia
- ... that atheists in Malaysia are often threatened with rape and murder? Source: "Nurulhuda’s atheist meetings remain secretive, she stressed, to protect the closeted atheists. [...] Death threats online and over the phone are common, she said. [...] The most common threat to her and other ex-Muslim women is rape, she explained." — Intolerance Rising: Atheists at Risk in Malaysia
- Reviewed: [[]]
- Comment: No QPQ needed.
Created by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk). Self-nominated at 20:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- not at sentence end - Interesting:
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Solid article, no major issues; and makes me appreciate living in my country (although I technically don't identify as an atheist, I value having the freedom to choose). However, per DYK rules, the citation for the hook needs to be directly after the sentence end. You can simply repeat it there, then I'll approve. –LordPeterII (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, LordPeterII, I think I fixed what you were talking about. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @An anonymous username, not my real name: Ah, no, it seems you misunderstood: Per the criteria, 3b,
Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact.
So I didn't mean this nomination page, but the article. I did the change in this edit, so now it's correct. I just wanted to point out that this is required, mainly so it's easier to check that the hook is actually accurate per the source(s). 
Approve nomination since hook fact checks out. –LordPeterII (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I thought I was missing something. Thank you. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @An anonymous username, not my real name: Ah, no, it seems you misunderstood: Per the criteria, 3b,
