Template:Did you know nominations/John Titus (jurist)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

John Titus (jurist)

edit

Created/expanded by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 00:25, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism


  • Everything looks good here. This was an interesting article, the only thing I can think of off-hand that might add to it would be the prosecutor's name. Regardless, I readily pass this article, even without the name of the prosecutor in the article. IvoShandor (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)