Template:Did you know nominations/Kaneiolouma Complex

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 11:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Kāneiolouma Complex

(

)

Four kiʻi representing Hawaiian deities

... that the ancient Hawaiian village known as the Kāneiolouma Complex had 23 kiʻi denoting the sacred nature of the space? Source: https://www.hawaiimagazine.com/in-poipu-kauai-a-historic-hawaiian-village-is-coming-back-to-life/
- ALT1: ... that the ancient Hawaiian village known as the Kāneiolouma Complex is across the street from a popular beach on island of Kauaʻi? Source: https://www.hawaiimagazine.com/in-poipu-kauai-a-historic-hawaiian-village-is-coming-back-to-life/
- Reviewed:

Created by Adflatuss (talk). Self-nominated at 21:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kaneiolouma Complex; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

*

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: All good to go to me! QPQ not needed since it's the first DYK nomination for the user. cyclopia ^speak! 11:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I've reopened this. See Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Kāneiolouma Complex (nom). Schwede 66 21:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

New reviewer needed to check for close paraphrasing/plagiarism concerns. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Still some in the last paragraph, and really, as written this would deserve {{no lead}}, so one should be written.--Laun chba ller 11:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer needed to check subsequent changes; nominator has posted on their talk page that they believe they have addressed the issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Looks good to me.--Laun chba ller 16:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)