- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Article too short
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kefayah al-osul
edit- ... that more than a hundred commentaries have been written on Kefayah al-osul?
Created by Homiho (talk). Self-nominated at 05:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC).
: Article is new enough and long enough (2728 B). It is sourced, and free of copyright problems. Hook's character count is within the legal limits, but Hook has been not verified by provided inline citation. Please add reliable source or sources for Hook. There is two tags in the article. It is better removing them. So my suggestion is to register the article here. ThanksSaff V. (talk) 08:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V.: I think all of problems are removed.Homiho (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Homiho: thanks for your edits. It seems the copy editing of the article was done, but unfortunately the current size of article is not acceptable ([[1]]. Also there is no (cited) hook in the article. It is better to expand the article. As the last point, i think there is more interesting ALT s in the article. So if you like i can suggest! tanks for your patiantSaff V. (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is way too short. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- As noted earlier, the GOCE copyedit left the article with 952 prose characters, which is indeed far too short for DYK since that 1500 is the absolute maximum. Given the lack of response to this and other issues, it seems likely this will close very soon; I have just posted to the nominator's talk page. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
