Template:Did you know nominations/Kerstin von Lingen
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Sourcing and other issues not addressed.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kerstin von Lingen
edit- ... that Kerstin von Lingen wrote her PhD thesis on the war crimes trial of Field Marshal Albert Kesselring? Source: "1999-2001: wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin im SFB 437 "Kriegserfahrungen" in Tübingen, Thema: "Konstruktion von Kriegserfahrung. Der Prozess gegen Feldmarschall Albert Kesselring vor einem britischen Militärgericht". 2002-2003: Abschluß der Promotion, Rigorosum 29.7.2003" [1]
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- No, the article is almost entirely based on her CV, which is not an independent source. Although this can be used per WP:ABOUTSELF, an article must not be primarily based on such sources. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
In addition to the source not being independent, the result of using the CV so thoroughly is that the prose reads very much like a list. An article should go beyond a list of positions or publications. For example, what influenced her work? How has she revised or expanded on existing scholarship? Additional sources will help with this. Kim Post (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Good idea. Let me know when you have them, and I will incorporate them into the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Book reviews might be the most straightforward independent sources here.[2][3][4][5] Or, perhaps her own commentary on her work in front matter.[6] Kim Post (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging Hawkeye7; it's been over a month, and the article has not been edited at all. Please let us know whether you plan to return to this nomination or not. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Book reviews might be the most straightforward independent sources here.[2][3][4][5] Or, perhaps her own commentary on her work in front matter.[6] Kim Post (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
