Template:Did you know nominations/Leah Rawls Atkins

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Article far too short to qualify for DYK.

Leah Rawls Atkins

edit

Created by Bender235 (talk). Self nominated at 13:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC).

  • The article is nowhere near long enough (around 1/3 of the required 1,500 characters). I'd also prefer to see the citations fixed rather than raw URLs. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Left a message on the nominator's talk page. — Maile (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate your enthusiasm but if someone nominates a DYK and can't check on it themselves, it seems a little lame. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  • It is normal practice to inform nominators of problems with the nomination. See Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide#Finishing the review: If the outcome of your review is anything other than an approval ( or ), please consider notifying the article nominator(s); you can do this with a personal message on their talk page or by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} there (replacing "Article" by the heading of the nomination). Yoninah (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Nominator has been active during the two weeks since he was informed of issues and nothing has been done to address problems highlighted by initial reviewer. --Allen3 talk 14:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)